Fitton: Obama WH covered up Clinton email scandal

Posted on by admin



One America’s John Hines recently sat down with Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton for an exclusive interview on how the Obama administration helped cover for Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of her email server.

Here’s more.

Visit us at:

Website:

Facebook:

Twitter:

source: https://krescentmoon.net/

Xem thêm các bài viết về Giải Trí: https://krescentmoon.net/category/giai-tri/

Related Post

36 thoughts on “Fitton: Obama WH covered up Clinton email scandal”

  2. Of course they did ! You can't put a Southside Chicago Con Man in charge without a criminal element being involved ! They ran a criminal enterprise out of the White House with intent of enriching themselves while destroying America !!

    Reply

  3. I don't get it! Hillary had personal server that got hacked. Treasonous! Uranium One deal? Clinton Foundation? Hit list? Epstein? Why doesn't she go to jail?

    Reply

  6. Deliberately changing the classification of government e-mails. Do yah think that the culprits will be prosecuted? TBD and years away.

    Reply

  10. Obama WH covered up a whole lot of crap that's now stored in his library! The law should not allow him to hide the things that would prove "HE" lead his administration in illegal activities too numerous to ignore! Change the law and open his library doors and the whole country will want to see him and the others hang in public view!

    Reply

  11. Infiltration started in VA. Kaines prize for VP, gains for Warner. The breech is beyond your comprehension. Africa, Iran, China and of course Russia.

    Reply

  14. You know what either making arrests or shut the fuck up because everybody talks about this person's in trouble back and forth back and forth and no arrests are made if you have the evidence make an arrest if you don't have the evidence then let it go

    Reply

  16. If this was Joe Blow down the street he would be locked up and hung….
    How shameful is this that HILLARY IS STILL FREE….
    HILLARY DOES NOT HAVE SLEEPLESS NIGHTS OR ANY RESPECT FOR ANYONE INCLUDING HERSELF… DONT GIVE HER A TRIAL JUST HANG HER..

    ED

    Reply

  18. See you tube videos TONY Podesta ART MARINA Abramavich SPIRIT COOKING JOHN Podesta wiki leaks emails FATHER JOHN Podesta JAMES Alafantis Ping Pong PIZZA LAURA Silsby and NOW EPSTEIN AGAIN ! THESE BABY SLAUGHTERING SATANIST ILLUMINATI scum ARE ALL CONNECTED ! REALITY ! RESEARCH INVESTIGATE don't take my word for it ! JUSTICE SOON

    Reply

  19. Clinton is the queen psychopathic criminal cunt of the universe. She is disgusting beyond belief. I pray General Barr and John Durham have the integrity, guts and the balls to bring this witch and all her ministers DOWN. We need accountability in the USA like never before. She belongs in federal prison awaiting her date with the Guillotine or the Electric Chair. Make a statement!!

    Reply

  22. How many more times can they tell us what we've been knowing for years?
    It's the same info over and over.
    Lip service to keep us believing that Justice will be served.
    Our grandkids will be hearing this same jargon wondering what's it about.

    Reply

  24. Can you report on this?
    #FreeAlbertWilson Look at the look on his face. Albert can't believe this bullshit.

    How TF did I get 12 years in prison when her rape kit showed up negative proving NO Intercourse? That's what Albert is still asking himself right now in his cell. #foxnews #msnbc #cnn

    Reply

  29. I got a dollar that says nothing will be done no-one will be prosecuted due to who they are or because they're black and connected to oblama

    Reply

  31. That is one ugly woman. I see why Bill cheated on her. Could you imagine having to wake up next to that? Sorry Bill we know you wanted her to win, so you could have sex again. Just leave that ugly bitch. You are not president any more. No need to stay with her.

    Reply

  33. The cover up, was – is not about Hilary but if the string was pull out.
    It will uncovered a more sinister, fishing fish's

    Reply

  34. "SO WHY IS SHE STILL FREE WALKING AROUND LIKE SHES QUEEN!?!", SHE FEELS UNTOUCHABLE AND PROTECTED BY WHO!?!", IM SURE SHE GOTS ALOT OF DIRT ON OTHERS LET ALONE HERSELF!!", NEVER THE LESS WE KEEP HEARING GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY & AND SHES NOT LOCKED UP!?!"

    Reply

  36. Like this..High Treason. There President Hillary email 7635.-

    From: 
    To: 
    Date: 2012-06-17 22:54
    Subject: –

    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772829 Date: 02/13/2016

    RELEASE IN FULL

    From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
    Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:54 AM
    To:

    Subject: Fyi wapo op ed

    Marc A. Thiessen: WikiLeaks, meet ObamaLeaks

    Marc A. Thiessen
    Monday, Jun 18, 2012

    Imagine there was an organization that serially leaked the nation's most highly protected secrets — exposing
    intelligence sources and methods, and sharing classified information with the press that put lives at risk.

    Sounds like WikiLeaks? Think again. It's ObamaLeaks.

    The difference, of course, is that WikiLeaks releases information that it believes will be embarrassing for the United

    States, while ObamaLeaks releases information intended to make President Obama look good. But ObamaLeaks has
    done damage to U.S. national security on a scale of which WikiLeaks only dreams.

    Consider just some of the information that has been exposed in recent months — from the identity of the Pakistani
    doctor who helped us track down bin Laden, to the role of a double agent recruited in London by British intelligence in
    breaking up a new underwear bomb plot in Yemen, to the fact that the President Obama personally ordered

    cyberattacks on the Iranian nuclear program — an act of war.

    Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has said the recent leaks are the worst he has in his 30 year intelligence

    career. Sen. Diane Feinstein (0-Calif.) recently declared, "I've been on the Intelligence Committee for 11 years, and I
    have never seen it worse."

    It is clear that these leaks originated in the White House. The New York Times story on the cyberattack on Iran's nuclear
    program cites "members of the President's national security team who were in the [Situation Room]" and even quote

    the president asking during a top secret meeting: "Should we shut this thing down?" How many people were there when
    the president uttered those words? Not many.

    The White House stands accused of leaking classified information to make the president look good in an election year —
    a very serious charge. So who does the administration appoint to investigate itself? A U.S. attorney, Ronald Machen,
    who gave thousands of dollars to Obama's first senate race and his presidential campaign, helped vet candidates for the

    vice presidential nomination, and called Obama a "legend" in a 2010 Post profile.

    You can't make this stuff up.

    Imagine for a moment the uproar that would have ensued if Karl Rove had been cleared of wrongdoing in the Valerie
    Plame affair not by an independent counsel, but by a Bush political insider? No matter how capable a U.S. attorney

    Machen may be, if he clears the administration of wrongdoing, no one will believe it. Having an early political supporter
    of the president, who reports to another political appointee, the attorney general, who may soon face contempt of
    Congress charges, conduct this investigation is probably not the smart way to go.

    That last thing the Obama administration should want is to have even the appearance that they are politicizing this

    investigation. If the accusations are indeed "outrageous" and "wrong," as President Obama claims, then it is in his
    interests to see a special counsel appointed whose independence cannot be questioned.

    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772829 Date: 02/13/2016

    Some have pointed to the flaws of the Plame investigation as evidence of why appointing special counsel to investigate
    ObamaLeaks would be a mistake. Fair enough. But many of these opponents of appointing a special counsel are the very
    same people who demanded a special counsel in the Plame affair, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and then-Sen.

    Joe Biden. Plame was not even a covert agent when her name was leaked. Today, we have seen covert sources and
    current operations exposed. These leaks put in danger the lives of people cooperating with us. And they put all
    Americans at risk — because they make it less likely that foreign sources will work with us, and other countries will

    cooperate with us, in the future. Unlike the Plame affair, the damage caused by ObamaLeaks is serious, lasting and real.

    The White House has no one to blame but themselves for this mess. From getting Osama bin Laden to killing Anwar al-
    Awlaki, they had a compelling story to tell on national security. But they overreached — releasing classified information
    in order to paint a glowing portrait of the president as a strong commander in chief. The irony is the disclosures have

    had the opposite effect — giving the president's opponents a potent issue with which to attack his record. ObamaLeaks
    not only damaged national security, they damaged Obama's political fortunes as well.

    A special counsel may not be ideal. But in light of the seriousness of the leaks, and the Obama administration's bungling
    of the investigation, there is no other viable alternative. The time has come to appoint a special counsel to investigate

    ObamaLeaks.

    See Also US Diplomatic Cable Search

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *